I. Busker's Festival
When we arrived in Moncton, New Brunswick, one mid-summer Friday, a
long banner over the main downtown street heralded: BUSKER'S
FESTIVAL...
My daughter, not a typical American, asked a typical American
question: "What's a busker?"
Felt like a bad parent, so my answer was more than she bargained
for: "Busker is the single word for
street-performer. I'm a busker; I've been one since before
you were born. What else do you notice about that banner?"
"Colorful. And the festival starts tonight."
"What else?"
Her expression said, "Go ahead, get it out, and get it over
with." I see that expression on college freshmen all the
time.
"They don't define busker; they don't have to. Not
in Canada, not in any other
English-speaking country in the world. Only in
America..." As I'll do in class, I forgot that I was
speaking to anyone in particular and started raging at everyone in
general. "We live," I concluded a block and a half later,
"in the only country on earth where most people regard buskers as
beggars with gimmicks."
Students welcome these rants as free entertainment, but my daughter
is, well, a busker's daughter. Barely 13 at the time, she was
still a long way from inheriting the thick skin required by my trade
or my tirade.
"You're not a beggar," she insisted.
So I lightened up: "The word is also a verb. I busk,
you busk, he or she busks. Hamlet originally pondered, 'To
busk or not to busk,' but Shakespeare dumbed it down for American
audiences."
She rolled her eyes, as do my students, and we had a fine time with
my Canadian colleagues later that same evening.
II. To Prepare Oneself
As we toured the Maritime Provinces we learned that many Canadian cities have such
festivals, an item which caught the notice of someone in the New
England coastal tourist town where I most frequently play. On a
mid-summer's day a few years later, banners appeared over the main
street announcing a "Buskers' Festival," much to my surprise
and to the surprise of the handful of other buskers who play here.
When I inquired why we were not included, one merchant insisted that
buskers are clowns, mimes, jugglers, balloon artists, yo-yo virtuosi,
and the like. In other words, entertainers specifically for
young children. Nor did it do any good to show her a photocopy
from Webster's.
Well, it didn't do her any good, but I learned something from that
italicized etymology that precedes the definition:
Busker derives from an Old Norse verb still heard in Scotland,
busk, meaning "to prepare oneself."
Even I rolled my eyes when it dawned on me that my parody of Hamlet
makes more sense of the word busk than do the public relations
efforts of my local chamber of commerce.
III. Busking the USA
Call me Hamm Lynn. As the world whirls into the 21st Century, I
now cling to the 15th by taking that name--as if a quarter century of
busking is not enough of an attempt to live in the past. Robert
Browning can take what liberties he will with the tale, but the fact
is that in June, 1484, a funny-dressed flautist struck a bargain with
an Alpine town beset by flood to rid it of rats. When the more
savvy members of the town council realized that receding rats
followed receding waters rather than preceding music, they stopped
payment, prompting the Pied Piper's revenge. Even then it was
more the mushroom-laced bread than melodies in G and D that got the
kids. Go ask Alice. Or go ask Jeeves.
About half-way between now and then, a young fellow with generous
gifts of gab and wit took to the streets of colonial Philadelphia and
boomed out ballads blasting British rule. Today, he would be
appreciated by some as a busker, ridiculed by others as a pubic
nuisance, dismissed by yet others as both. But he wrote and
sang in an age when the public still listened for more than amusement
and still heard more than what may have been convenient. Hence,
the Continental Congress would hear Ben Franklin's voice for
Pennsylvania; English royalty would hear it for America's
revolution; European courts for American democracy.
Between now and Ben, numerous talents have emerged from city streets
throughout America to make their marks on our art and culture.
Among the earliest was a young Sam Clemens who, in favor of his
sharper pen, left his guitar in San Francisco, another reason to call
him Mark Twain. He was still writing about The River
when Louis Armstrong took his cornet to the streets of New Orleans,
and numerous other jazz and blues artists chimed in upriver in St.
Louis and Memphis, uptrain in Chicago. Soon, downtown Baltimore
would hear Cab Calloway, and Frank Sinatra would croon in front of
the hotels of Hoboken, N.J., while Milton Berle sang and danced on
the sidewalks of Manhattan. Later, in New York and Boston,
artists such as Paul Simon, Bonnie Raitt, and Tracy Chapman would
hone their crafts into recording careers.
Street-performance thrived in America during the Jazz Age. The
most prominent, unifying theme of filmmaker Ken Burns' PBS
documentary, Jazz, is that for years it was an infectious
music that made young people want to play it. Moreover, many of
these aspiring musicians were growing up in large
families--immigrants from Europe onto our eastern shore, and internal
immigrants from the Jim Crow South into our northern cities--and
needed to help support their families. Rather than asking
outright, "Brother, can you spare a dime?" these fledgling
musicians--most of them too young to play nightclubs anyway--played
in the streets and let the dimes fall where they may.
Meanwhile, ethnic music was strong in ethnic neighborhoods. New
York City licensed 1,600 street-musicians in 1923, according to the
Boston-based busker and busker-historian Stephen Baird. Half of
them were organ-grinders. Indeed, numerous buskers in American
cities during our waves of immigration had been buskers in European
cities. More and better jobs would logically mean more
and better tips.
However, just as the Jazz Age closed behind the electronic curtain of
on-coming radio and movies, so too did street-music. In the
words of the "Boswell of Busking," Patricia C. Campbell, it began
"to seem old-fashioned and naive"--a remark that could as well
summarize any number of scenes from Sinclair Lewis' novels, set in
the Roaring Twenties, showing the effect of the automobile on such
pastimes as sledding and bicycling. Cambpell's 1981 book,
Passing the Hat, documents the "death warrant" signed by
Mayor Fiorello La Guardia on New Year's Day, 1936, stating that the
city should have no part in "this concession of mendicancy."
And so the stereotype of busker as beggar, if not set in stone, was
writ into law. Both Baird and Campell report that, except for the odd
outposts of New Orleans and San Francisco where the unusual is the
usual, street-performance vanished from American streets and
consciousness until well into the Roaring Back Sixties. At
first it was little more than an outcropping of the counter-culture,
not so much to earn or supplement a livelihood, but as one of a
variety of ways--along with smoking marijuana and wearing colorful
clothing and beads--to express social, political, and sexual
liberation in public places. And tips, what few there were,
indicated approval for artists' politics or lifestyle more
than appreciation for the art. Nor was there much thought of
money, as public artists were more likely to perform on or near a
college campus than to attach themselves to a marketplace.
By no mere coincidence, then, attractive marketplaces located near
the centers of large universities became havens for public
performers. Berkeley and Santa Cruz in California; Boulder,
Colorado; and Harvard Square soon had reputations that drew
musicians, magicians, and mimes as readily as Hollywood drew
actors and cinematographers. All numbers were higher, more
people and more tips, in a setting where money was already changing
hands and storefronts served as picturesque backdrops. All of
this gave performers the idea that they could play for a reliable
income, and in so doing, improve an act, tailoring songs, tricks,
mimes, and jokes for passersby willing to make eye-contact.
When the place and the audience became part of the show, busking was
reborn.
The infant art would thrive thanks to a development quite apart from
the hippie hangouts of its gestation. In the White House, First
Lady Jacqueline Kennedy took up the cause of preserving and restoring
buildings and homes built in the 17th, 18th, and 19th
centuries. Although her stay in Washington was short, she
continued her efforts during her long career as an editor in New
York, enlisting countless influential Americans in the cause, the
late violinist Isaac Stern among them. Back in the White House,
her successor, Lady Bird Johnson, applied the same principle to
public space in her campaign to "beautify" America.
In January 1969, a new administration would inherit efforts so
substantial from the two women that the National Trust for Historic
Preservation might have seemed like a name for an agency already in
place. But give credit where it is due: Nixon's the one
who signed the orders to extend grants for historic preservation,
restoration, rehabilitation, renovation, and more of entire downtown
districts in cities large and small. In the Settling Down
Seventies, run-down, burned-out shells of places as diverse as
Larimer Square in Denver, The Flats in Cleveland, and Essex Street in
Salem, Mass., became tourist attractions with open, scenic spaces
among their storefronts. Benches appeared under the trees and
newly-fashioned 19th Century lamposts, in addition to tables and
chairs placed outside by cafes, restaurants, and bars.
But the news-of-old has not been entirely free of modern obstacles
for buskers. While chambers of commerce have embraced the
concept of historic preservation for the appearance of a marketplace,
they tend to neglect--and at times reject--what it should mean
regarding sound. Since 1982, I have had to petition the
chambers of both Salem and Newburyport, Mass., at least a dozen times
over the use of outdoor loudspeakers by businesses seeking to draw
attention to themselves. Reluctant to restrict a dues-paying
member, their response usually echoes that of the proprietors who
"pay rent." Sometimes the business will relent, usually
when a few of their neighbors take my side. More often I
prevail by making the case in a letter to the local newspaper, always
quoting the chambers' own brochures promoting "the way life used
to be."
On a rendezvous in Denver in 1998, I took my daughter to Larimer
Square to show her the spots where I first played. The sight
hadn't changed in 20 years, but the air was filled with a tinny,
low-fidelity reproduction of a top-40 tune coming from several
speakers mounted onto lamposts that lined the street. This, in
a marketplace that once featured a violinist on its brochure with the
caption, "Delight in a street-musician."
As stunned as I was that day in Denver, it wasn't until later that
year that I realized the full extent of the contradiction.
Michael Burke, a frequent Newburyport busker, was half-way into his
opening song when a woman from a nearby store leaned in to ask:
"Can you lower your volume? I'm playing Ella in my
shop." She meant, of course, Ella Fitzgerald--or,
rather, a tape-recording of Ella Fitzgerald. And that's when
it hit me: Would Ms. Fitzgerald herself ever want her
recorded music to pre-empt a live musician?
Apart from these chronic audio-infringements, historic preservation
has been both boom and boon for buskers. It has presented us
with not just stages, but fairly well-appointed outdoor
auditoriums. The emphasis on brick, furthermore, enhances the
acoustics for musicians, which is why the voices and instruments of
countless folk and folk-rock musicians over the past quarter century
have flavored the popular public squares and crossings of many
northeastern cities.
IV. Non-Admission Price
With so much American busking tradition before me, why would I identify myself
with a character from a time when America was but a gleam of China in
the eyes of European cartographers and navigators, merchants and
monarchs? And why would I, a seasoned and devout busker since I
took to Larimer Square in 1977, claim lineage to a con-artist whose
only use of the streets was to take his audience down a road of no
return?
At first it was simply a name to fill a program. Four years ago
I joined King Richard's Faire in Carver, Mass., just as many
buskers perform in renaissance festivals all over North America to
supplement modest incomes. A few less burgers to flip, tables
to wait, deliveries to make. In my case, a few less classes of
college writing to teach, which, because I am one of the 43% of all
college faculty nationwide with part-time, no-benefit status is a
very good deal.
Since I'm a flautist and for years have heard myself called by the
name of an actual character from the early renaissance, the
connection seemed ancestral. Taking the town's name, Hamlin,
was word-play to describe a hammed-up act.
The effect on my performance as a busker was immediate. As
anyone who has been in theater will confirm, a costume--in my case,
period shirts with billowing sleeves, layered with colorful vests and
sashes--propels you into character. No longer was it merely a
selection of Celtic songs and Baroque compositions but a presence, an
attitude, which appealed to the public. A memorable moment
while going about routines, spontaneous entertainment while shopping,
photos for the albums, cassettes for the VCR, something unlikely to
talk about, a spark for children's curiosity.
For years I've been able to surprise listeners with "Thank you"
and "Hello" in mid-song, but now I gain more laughs with the
unexpected "Nice Hat" and "Nice Shoes" and "(your
imagination here)" --inspired by my fellow rennies'
"Wondrous Hat, M'Lady" and "Splendid Leggings, M'Lord"
and "(your imagination there)." One Jethro Tull concert is
enough to show a flautist that an occasional grunt or groan can
provoke a laugh, although my own daughter once warned me to tone it
down because I was sometimes scaring little kids. Thanks to the
renfaire, such things are now in character. I've also been
hamming it up more for cameras, moreso for camcorders, sometimes
moving right at them, eyes wild, sometimes cross, finding riffs
played by the left hand alone so the right can fly. You get the
moving picture.
Sure, I've been aware of all of that since I began busking, but
only as Hamm Lynn have I realized it adds up to a public role that
cannot be played by--indeed, a public need that cannot be met
by--stage or festival performers of any degree of
talent.
Buskers never have to make arrangements regarding schedules,
authorization, staging, payment, and all else claiming the attention
of stage or festival performers. Most times those arrangements
lead to an admission price which some folk, among them mostly
families, cannot often pay. Moreover, most venues for musicians
must restrict entry to those over the
drinking-so-as-not-to-be-thinking age.
The result is an inadvertent non-admission price paid
unwittingly by American parents--and rather heavily by American
children.
If you think that this is overstated, spend some time with me in
Newburyport, Salem, or Portsmouth, N.H., and listen to some of
the comments from parents and their children, and maybe strike
up your own conversations with them. Numerous times I'm told
that I'm the first musician that a child has seen and heard live,
and in some cases the
child is not all that young. Sometimes he or she is the one who
tells me. The implied compliment is always a harrowing reminder
of how far the arts are now removed from day-to-day American life.
We allowed this when we watched our schools cut and curtail both
curricula and extra-curricula programs with the narrow-minded idea
from the Bottom Line Eighties that the arts are
"frills." Years later we're beside ourselves
wondering how and why American youth is enthralled by music played
very fast and extremely loud.
Ironically, all our attention to lewd and hostile lyrics only
compounds our inability to grasp that this enthrallment is with loud
aggression. As the Beatles proved with the dual tracks of
"Revolution" on their White Album, instrumentation will
determine how we perceive a song. Hence, the first track is
heard as raucous and rabble-rousing, with some shrill mention of a
communist icon no less; the slower, calm second version is heard as a
cautionary tale: "Well, if you're carrying pictures of
Chairman Mao/ You're not going to make it with anyone
anyhow." Only beat and bass survive the volume and speed of
the first version--and it is that first version which serves as a
forerunner of much of what American youth favors today.
Nor is it any mere coincidence that beat and bass form music's
bottom-line. While American politics, sports, education,
medicine, and more devolve toward the point where the bottom-line is
the only line, it's eerily logical that music, in the ears of
American adolescents, should follow suit. Given the chance,
younger children's responses to bottom-line-only music might well
echo that most public retort from the privatized Eighties:
Where's the melody? Where's the rythym?
V. Having Fun Yet?
We say that this trend in
music, and in all else, is a sign of the times, and we resign
ourselves to it. It's as if a country or a culture has the
same aging process as that of people and animals, and nothing can be
done to reverse it. Reminds me of Thomas Paine's opening line
to Common Sense: "...a long habit of not thinking a
thing wrong , gives it the superficial appearance of being
right."
For buskers, the mounting stress felt by the American public in this
increasingly gotta-go-go and decreasingly stable world, has yielded
an odd harvest. In the weeks following the trauma of September
11, both National Public Radio and the Boston Globe reported
the increased attention we were getting from a public suddenly
willing to pause for reflection. One singer on a Boston subway
platform told of a generous tip from a woman who let her train pass
three times while she copied the words to a song.
As far back as the late-Eighties, I noticed that I was a
reverse barometer of the economy. A beneficiary of the same
trend, harper and Newburyport busker David Bishop thinks that when
it's more difficult to buy stylish clothes and dine at gourmet
restaurants, people find it easier to give a one dollar tip. My
non-busker friends guess that there's more appreciation for the
sight of those visibly working for every dollar. No matter what
the psychology, every busker I know agrees that our tips have gotten
better in recent years. Michael Burke may have explained it
best. As people's lives become more busy, more crowded, more
rushed, he reasons, they feel a certain pressure to have fun in free
time. "They feel that they have to work at it," he observes.
For him it's a paradox he can work with; he plays guitar, so the
public expects a range of sound. I play recorders, those
old-style wooden flutes, the very sight of which causes some folk to
bounce to the beat of an Irish jig--no matter that I might be playing
a Bach Aire. The result is usually so comical that I try to
keep a straight face long enough to abbreviate the piece and segue
into a dance tune. However, there is nothing at all comical
about the young parents who, with all good intentions, will start
bouncing their toddlers to a beat quite apart from what they
hear--that is to say, what the children hear, but what the parents
cannot.
When I see the little brows furrow, when I hear the confusion in
their high-pitched voices, I worry that I'm the cause of some kind
of audio-trauma. Enough such episodes have convinced me that I
do have more in common with the story of the Pied Piper than I
realized during all those years when I politely smiled to conceal my
inner cringing at the stereotype.
VI. Flooded by the Sound
The Piper worked no magic with music; for all we know, he may not have even
been a very good musician. But he did know floods, and if
America is awash in anything, it is cheap sound. Flooded by
Muzak in stores and malls and bus-stops, by simple-minded jingles at
every commercial break on television and radio, by sound systems
booming beat and bass from cars cruising city streets, our sense of
hearing is like a set of teeth ground down by a steady diet of sugar
candy, and we are left with raw gums by age twelve. As
trumpeter Wynton Marsalis answered when David Frost asked him to
explain the popularity of gangsta rap and heavy metal, we are from
birth innundated with "music that never develops."
And we wonder why our children follow rage-laced sounds down wrong
roads of no return?
Take what liberties you will to stay afloat, but I navigate into the
new millenium as a busker. Some would say I'm already
extinct; others would call me on the verge. But if street-music
is about anything, it is about reviving the best of our public past
that otherwise drowns in our privatized present.
For me the question "To Busk or Not to Busk" is easy to
answer. Buskers perform not for audiences with set
expectations, but for a public that is palpably frustrated by prices
forever pumped up and entertainment too long dumbed down.
Perhaps the woman from the chamber of commerce had a point:
Young children are the ones most aware of this, and open to what is
better. As Paine might say, they are free of the "long
habit."
If buskers can claim to fill one public need, it is that we serve as
life-preservers in the modern flood of contrivance. At the very
least, we serve as immediate proof to children that art can be,
should be, part of life. In time, some may come to think
of us as the start of an idea that they, too, can perform and
entertain--an idea that needs to take hold before the allure of and
addictions to easy plug-in drugs. Children are born with
senses, not yet ground down, that can distinguish the authentic from
the false, and the distinction is never more pronounced than between
an electronic device built into the ceilings of indoor malls and a
musician tapping a foot on outdoor pavement. Who, after all,
ever says "Thank you" to a loudspeaker?
America will be better off when we are willing to look at what our
children see. And listen to what they hear.
For a fine time any given day or evening, admission is purposefully
free.